{"id":4806,"date":"2015-03-27T12:14:17","date_gmt":"2015-03-27T16:14:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.garycombs.org\/blog\/?p=2654"},"modified":"2017-01-05T16:42:16","modified_gmt":"2017-01-05T16:42:16","slug":"two-gospel-thieves-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.garycombs.org\/blog\/2015\/03\/two-gospel-thieves-2.html","title":{"rendered":"Two gospel thieves"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Gospel<\/a>
\n\u201cJust as Christ was crucified between two thieves,\u201d so the gospel \u201cis ever crucified between two opposite errors\u201d <\/em>(Tertullian, early church father).<\/p>\n

\u201cIf our gospel message even slightly resembles \u2018you must believe and live right to be saved\u2019 or \u2018God loves and accepts everyone just as they are,\u2019 we will find our communication is not doing the identity-changing, heart-shaping, transformative work\u2026\u201d of the gospel. <\/em>\u00a0(Tim Keller,\u00a0Center Church<\/em>).<\/p>\n

\u201cAnd the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth\u201d <\/em>(John 1:14 NKJV).<\/p>\n

I designed the above graph with the cross of Christ at the center to illustrate the way the gospel challenges both sides of the coin of human religion (this was inspired by Tim Keller\u2019s graph in his book,\u00a0Center Church<\/em>). I describe it is as one coin with two sides because although both approaches seem radically different, they both have in common their avoidance of Jesus Christ as Savior and Lord and their desire to retain control of their lives. These two sides of the coin are like gospel \u201cthieves\u201d as Tertullian described them, misrepresenting and robbing the gospel of its appropriate focus on the person and work of Christ.<\/p>\n

On one side is the legalistic\/religious approach that takes the idea of truth and holiness to the extreme. It says that one must obey the truth and keep the rules\/laws of God in order to be saved. On the other side is the relativistic\/irreligious approach that takes the idea of love and grace too far. Believing that all are accepted by a loving God (if there is a God), they say that everyone has the right to follow their own sense of right and wrong.<\/p>\n

The first approach emphasizes truth without grace. The second, grace without truth.\u00a0But truth without grace is not really truth, and grace without truth is not really grace. However, the gospel is neither religion nor irreligion. The gospel is about having a relationship with God through\u00a0Jesus Christ who is \u201cfull of grace\u00a0and\u00a0<\/i>truth.\u201d<\/p>\n

The gospel is the good news that Jesus has already accomplished our salvation, reconciling us to God and satisfying both His holiness and mercy. The true gospel hangs between the two gospel \u201cthieves\u201d offering two striking corrections:<\/p>\n